Mar 14
Housework is the new Viagra
Cats: slack woman|Forget the flowers, chocolates and the racy lacy lingerie, boys.
If you really want to get your gal in the mood, take home a nice bottle of vintage Lysol, fill a bucket with steaming hot water and try on a pair of yellow rubber gloves.
That will get your gal in the mood according a new study which says married men get more sex if they do their fair share around the house.
So the next time you get love on the mind, men, don’t look at her with bedroom eyes. Gaze at her with I’m-going-to-scrub-the-toilet-bowl eyes.
You could be smiling for days.
March 14th, 2008 at 11:22 am
Does it work if you hire someone to scrub the toilet? Is my Roomba robotic vacuum cutting into my sex life? Why don’t they teach this in school?
March 14th, 2008 at 11:42 am
Yeah, that would work like three or four times. After that, it’d be: “Oh, I see you vacuumed again. … But you didn’t dust…” Pretty soon, you’re a completely emasculated man-servant.
March 14th, 2008 at 12:14 pm
I need to hire a hawt cleaning man.
March 14th, 2008 at 1:59 pm
You’d think they’d just cracked the double helix the way they’re waving this study around – I’m surprised they haven’t hired a publicity firm to spread the astonishing news.
March 14th, 2008 at 7:05 pm
There used to be a guy in LA that would post ads for nude housecleaning on Craigslist. I think someone I knew took him up on it and she said he was fine. She didn’t say anything about his skills with toilet-scrubbing, though.
March 14th, 2008 at 7:18 pm
Dick, Roomba robotic vacuum. I bet there are websites dedicated to the sexual gratification of watch one of those things at work.
Patrick, emasculated man servant sounds good to me. Dust away…
Beth, cleaning men. Has a ring, doesn’t it?
BB, I think they have hired a publicity firm. This story was on the front page of my newspaper.
Moxie, that would be a Cleaning Man with Benefits.
March 14th, 2008 at 10:31 pm
This study is just more evidence of how popular this site is. Is it a coincidence that we were talking about this just a week or two ago, then all of a sudden, these “scientists” publish a “study” that practically plagerizes our comments? I guess we should be flattered that our comments were considered a scientific study.
March 15th, 2008 at 4:26 am
Yes h n p, those were my thoughts exactly